Art 4 Final

In the modern history of fine guile , there has been a great deal confusions towards the subject of cunning . What is art supposed to show ? muckle it be more conceptual than visual ? Can something displeasing be called art ? Who are the judges of ugliness ? What is watcher , in fact , and if it really exists , can we measure it ? just near of these questions are answered by a common saying : kayo is in the eye of the beholder . Yet can this tale really apply to artI believe that this explanation is both straight and un confessedly . To illustrate , I would want to retell a story I have been told . The Florentine Galleria dingle Accademia , besides the infamous David , also contains a room of poultice casts made from 18th and 19th century statues . And among them sticks out like a sore thumb a great postmodern foot , done crudely out of proportion and of obsolete ugliness , purported to symbolize the dismemberment of the human body by culture . At the end of the tour , the guide tells the visitors about a statue of Mars , washed into the river and found itemless , and how its head was found by a common man , who knew it to be a work of art , and gave it to the experts The guide then asks how some(prenominal) of the visitors would rescue this piece of new art from the river , and concludes from the ever-present arouse negative response that this isn t art per se , or art recognizable by artIndeed , classical secular art that hails from old-timer times is supposed to be mimicking things of nature - and nature , as it is well-known , does have certain proportions which seem beautiful to the eyeball . The golden proportion was made popular by the Da Vinci code , and many other laws of perspective are taught in any art school . These proportions , which help depict an mark as more lifelike . This is quite akin to the Aristotelic understanding of art .

Aristotle defined four main qualities of art : grandeur , proportion , and symmetry . All of these are considered to be required for beauty , the technological requirements for a work of art (or rather , in antiquity , a piece of ruse work ) to make an impression on the human soul . They utilize what we naturally see around us , and look at the best , most mathematically perfect of the examples available to us to replicate and create an impression Beauty is thus a quality which can be measured , and is completely objectiveIt is fire that it is commonly position that in the old Platonic-Aristotelian duel Aristotle is the develop and defender of art . This may heretofore be true from classical and neoclassical art . And yet he could belike non be called father of modern art , which though it contains some pieces strikingly beautiful to our own eyes , is not often mimetic or conformist . Indeed , even though Plato is far more rigid in the thought that art should conform to ideas , and display the idea as full as possible , he is no...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .