The use of Drugs & Alcohol in U.S.

1 share of the population) (1). slightly 54 million participated in squeeze drinking at least once in the 30 days introductory to the survey, and 16.1 million were heavy drinkers. Again, in that respect was little change since 2002. The highest preponderance of binge and heavy drinking was among young adults aged mingled with 18 and 25 years of age, with the peak for both measures locomote at age 21. Heavy inebriant use was inform by 15.1 per centum of those aged from 18 to 25, and by 18.7 percent of those aged 21. About 10.9 million persons aged between 12 and 20 years report drinking intoxicant in the month foregoing to the survey, with nearly 7.2 million being binge drinkers, and 2.3 million being heavy drinkers.

These figures are alarming, considering 34.9 percent of jejuneness aged between 12 and 17 years reported that smoking marijuana once a month was a great risk; 53.6 percent of youth said it would be easy to obtain marijuana; and 89.4 percent of youths reported that their parents would potently disapprove of their trying marijuana once or double (1). An estimated 21.6 million Americans in 2003 were classified with substance dependence, of whom 3.1 million ill-treat both alcohol and unlawful medicates, 3.8 million smeard illicit drugs alone, and 14.8 million stepd alcohol alone. Alarmingly, an estimated 13.6 percent of persons aged 12 or older drove under the influence of alcohol at least once in the 12 months prior to the interview in 2003, which was a slight drop since the 2002 numbers.

Although there are many outreach programs aimed at reducing the risks of HIV/AIDS among illicit intravenous drug users, there are many barriers to getting them into such programs (2). A recent study of a street outreach program (SOP) in New York City set about identifying these barriers both from the panorama of those needing the aid, and those offering it.

The study found that people did not register in the programs because there were a number of barriers preventing them, such as: personal-family issues, lack of insurance/Medicaid, ignorance, suspicion, and/or aversion to alcohol and early(a) drug abuse programs (AOD), "hassles" with Medicaid, lack of personal ID, lack of musculus quadriceps femoris in the programs, limited access to intake, homeless(prenominal)ness, and childcare-custody issues. Also, about 18 percent of these drug and alcohol abusers had no desire for treatment, reported no barriers, or were too deeply involved in their riding habit to enrol in the programs offered.

(2.) Appel, P. W., Ellison, A. A., Jansky, H. K., Oldak, R. Barriers to enrollment in drug abuse treatment and suggestions for reducing them: opinions of drug injecting street outreach clients and other musical arrangement stakeholders. AJDAA 2004:30(1):129-153.

A study comparing rural, urban, and metropolitan drug and alcohol abuse in the United States used the National Comorbidity be (NCS) (1990-1992) to yield a lifetime risk of psychiatric disorders in a probability sample of 8,098 respondents in the 48 nigh states using the DSM-III-R for diagnosis (5). Logistic regression of alcohol and drug disorders was performed on the data to compare rural, urban, and metropolitan areas, using socioeconomic variables. The data showed that household income had a protective effect completely in rural areas; high occupation strata were positively correlated with both drug and alcohol disorders; urban and metropolitan women were less likely to report drug disorders; and in rural areas, there was no gender difference in drug abuse
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.