The article, which argued newborns and foetuses were only potential persons and not actual persons, has provoked a storm of protest.
The originators, whose piece was promulgated in the Journal of Medical Ethics, have received finish threats for suggesting that what we call after-birth miscarriage (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.
some believe such possibilities should never be raised - so far within the confines of an ethics journal.
However, some anti-abortionists have welcomed its publication, saying it casts a bright light on what abortion very is.
Anthony Ozimic, from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC), said the article, which he exposit as a chilling promotion of infanticide, showed how abortion was creating a culture of death.
Related Articles
Abortion article author receives death threats
02 Mar 2012
Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say
29 Feb 2012
Dorries: Abortion clinics need better regulation
23 Feb 2012
Illegal abortion of baby girls: Lansley refers clinics to police
23 Feb 2012
Abortion investigation: Available if its a boy you exigencyed
23 Feb 2012
One in atomic number 23 abortion clinics suspected of breaking the law
22 Mar 2012
age he was appalled at the suggestion that newborns should be killed for their parents convenience, he nevertheless said it showed the logical framework behind infanticide and abortion was the same.
He said: The paper proves what pro-lifers have long been arguing: that the common arguments for abortion also justify infanticide.
There is no difference in moral status between a child one day before birth and a...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.