What is Tolerance?

" Nussbaum makes the case that we are each subsumeed to others and determine others because of a series of concentric circles that connect us to family, friends, communities, and other countries. However, she feels that patriotism disrupts this natural process of extending the self-importance toward others because patriotism is typically ethnocentric. In the valuing of adept's own culture, nations and individuals have a tendency to demean other cultures or consider them less(prenominal) "valuable." Because of this, we tend to devalue other great deal, cultures, and countries not for any intrinsic reason but because we are biased toward our own culture, nation, and its values. furthest from watering down the passion we feel for our own country and culture, Nussbaum (2002) believes that by viewing ourselves and others as "citizens of the world" we can guide on an even richer life, "The life of a cosmopolitan?need not be boring, flat or lacking of love."

Nussbaum's book contains critiques of her model of cosmopolitan and offers different theories both in contradiction and obligation with her views. Michael McConnell offers the most conservative approach to Nussbaum's proposed "cosmopolitan." McConnell argues that if individuals are denied a laborious sense of religious and national identity through via their culture, they go forth fail to appreciate or take pride in their country's or culture's achievements. Even worse, McConnell says they will fa

il to appreciate those of any other culture or country and develop what approaches a nihilistic attitude and perspective. If heap are lacking such a strong naming with national or religious pride, then cosmopolitanism remains something surcharge and unapproachable missing tradition.

The impact of globalization, increased diversity, and the spread of classless principles and neo-liberal economic reforms continues to reshape culture the world over. Like a marketer trying to create a "global" brand, Nussbaum and supply and company are trying to establish universal norms and values for speech and conduct that is not self-centered, i.e. ethnocentric.

In so doing, they whitethorn be failing to recognize that the concept of universal or international conduct and norms whitethorn be an illusion as much as a global brand. As Starbucks must modify its menu to appeal to differing tastes in various countries and cultures, so nationalism or patriotism and religious beliefs play an built-in role our love of self and country. Dispossession of such influences may be as illusive as a in truth "global" brand. Instead, perhaps education and training of young people who will become tomorrow's adult citizens should focus on bring out the best in patriotism and religious beliefs. Weithman (2003) hits on this in his review of Nussbaum's For Love of Country?, "Children might be better educated in forms of patriotism and religious committedness that are informed by the demands of justice. Rather than being taught cosmopolitanism, they should be encouraged to pursue those elements of their religious and national ideals that support supply the hungry, housing the poor and comforting the afflicted," (2). This may be the alone realistic means of sustaining globally the decent individual impulses promoted by Nussbaum and Gates and company.

I think Richard Falk offers one of the most legal theories in For Love of Country? He argues that Nussbaum's concept of "cosmopolitanism" is one th
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.