Drug Addiction is the Main Social Issues in U.S.

Before 1906, there were no regulations on the various nostrums and tonics that were available as cures for every cognise ailment. There were no requirements as to what could and could non be include in the ingredients for these remedies, and these so-called "patent medicines" might contain superior amounts of alcohol, morphine, heroin, cocaine, or a combination of these ingredients. medicates were used in umpteen different counties with relative impunity, and the dangers of drug were generally unknown. In 1887, Sigmund Freud print a work called "Craving For and Fear of Cocaine" in which he called the drug more dangerous than morphine. In 1901 the American Pharmacological Association condemned cocaine, and in 1906 the Pure Food and Drug doing severely limited the use of cocaine in medications and elixirs. Within a short time, the medical uses of cocaine disappeared. In 1914, the federal government passed the Harrison Narcotic Act to regulate the ways physicians could dispense drugs, and this helped keep drugs out of the hands of many population while forcing those already addicted to become criminals in mark to satisfy their cravings.

This was the beginning of drug prohibition, and it was succeeded by the attempt at prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s, which has served as an example to two sides in the end over legalization of drugs ever since. parapet did not stop drinking and it did turn

Targeting identifies the needs of the audience, creates a line of reasoning to solicitation to that need, and may use different levels with different audiences. Proponents of legalization chance upon certain needs on the part of their audience--the need for a reduction in crime, for a reduction in expenditures, for a reduction in the number of addicts or in near social costs of addiction. They see the audience as desiring a practical solution rather than one that might be considered moral but is less effective. Opponents usually cite a moral argument and assume that their audience places such considerations in a higher place those raised by the other side.

9) Legalization would free unique prison space for "real" criminals.

An appeal to precedent express is found in the argument against the idea that controlled legalization would subject crime, which opponents say is not the case. They cite the history of drug use, regulation, and tax in the United States. Indeed, they offer a deductive argument that eliminating crime is impossible given the fact that if drugs were legalized, it would be entirely for adults. We have legal alcohol and legal cigarettes, but not for minors. There would thus still be an economic inducement to provide drugs to those who are underage. It is estimated based on past fellowship that at last a quarter and perhaps more than a third of all drug buyers are underage. The uncreated source would likely be a diversion of drugs from adults to customers to a lower place the legal age, and the sellers would make a profit by adulterating the drugs or by marking them up. There might in addition be turf disputes and violence.

In 1937 the Marijuana Tax Act placed marijuana on the list of forbidden substances. The strongest aim in controlling drug use was social have words for most of this century, and during this period heroin became the primary drug of abuse. heroin users tended to live mainly in urban ghettoes and so did not come into contact with the mainstream of so
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.